Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:09, Philip Martin wrote: > Greg Stein writes: > >>> The first thing I tried leaks memory: >>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3967 >> >> Are you suggesting that my fix for 3888 caused this problem, or is >> incorrect in some way? Or is this a new, di

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Philip Martin
Greg Stein writes: >> The first thing I tried leaks memory: >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3967 > > Are you suggesting that my fix for 3888 caused this problem, or is > incorrect in some way? Or is this a new, distinct, and undiscovered > problem that you're bringing up?

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 06:44, Philip Martin wrote: > Greg Stein writes: >... >> Yup. It was listed as an issue for the 1.7.0 release. Now that it has >> been fixed.. sure: it should be merged to 1.7.x, and we're good to go. > > Enable a whole bunch of new code, and then say "look no bug reported

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Philip Martin
Greg Stein writes: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:14, Justin Erenkrantz > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> ... and tested and fixed. See the 1.7.x-issue3888 branch. It is >>> nominated for backport. >> >> I just reviewed all of the related commits (including what

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:14, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> ... and tested and fixed. See the 1.7.x-issue3888 branch. It is >> nominated for backport. > > I just reviewed all of the related commits (including what was > committed before the bran

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > ... and tested and fixed. See the 1.7.x-issue3888 branch. It is > nominated for backport. I just reviewed all of the related commits (including what was committed before the branch) - it looks good here and I added my +1 to 1.7.x/STATUS. Lots

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-20 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:53, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>... >> release-readiness?   What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in the >> appropriate state based on that library's readiness at this moment? > > The only pending serf issue is my

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-20 Thread kmradke
> From: Greg Stein > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:23, wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM: > >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato > >> wrote: > >> >... > >> > release-readiness? What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in the > >> > appropriate state base

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-20 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:23, wrote: > Greg Stein wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato >> wrote: >> >... >> > release-readiness?   What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in the >> > appropriate state based on that library's readiness at thi

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-20 Thread kmradke
Greg Stein wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >... > > release-readiness? What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in the > > appropriate state based on that library's readiness at this moment? > > The only pending serf issue is m

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-20 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 19:53, Greg Stein wrote: >... > The only pending serf issue is my testing of a fix to memory blowup in > ra_serf when somebody checks out a repository root (ie. 10's of There appears to be a bug in my debug code, or the original code. The night is done, but I will continue

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-19 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >... > release-readiness?   What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in the > appropriate state based on that library's readiness at this moment? The only pending serf issue is my testing of a fix to memory blowup in ra_serf when somebod

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > And I citing Mike's concerns about about RC-ness, I'm inclined to make > this one beta2. +1. -- justin

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-19 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:41 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 07/19/2011 10:15 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: >> Since there seems to be consensus regarding not releasing 1.7.0-beta1, >> I'll clean out STATUS and go roll beta2 this afternoon with the hopes >> of releasing it by the end of the week. >>

Re: 1.7.0-beta2 this afternoon

2011-07-19 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 07/19/2011 10:15 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > Since there seems to be consensus regarding not releasing 1.7.0-beta1, > I'll clean out STATUS and go roll beta2 this afternoon with the hopes > of releasing it by the end of the week. > > I'm half-tempted to call it rc1 and start the soak. Thoughts