RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 13:58 > To: 'Ivan Zhakov' > Cc: 'Greg Stein'; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1 > > > -Origin

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: ... > But there are *a lot* of users who think of svn cleanup as a tool to update > their recorded_size and recorded_mod time after they unleashed some tool on > their working copy. Or after they moved their working copy from A to B without pre

RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] > Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 13:38 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1 > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:28, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 11:18 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1 >> >>

RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 11:18 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1 > > >... > > I would suggest adding a new function for this purpose; and maybe a

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 05:29 -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 18:30, Julian Foad wrote: > > I'm planning to commit the attached wc-db-verification-1.patch, subject > > to any advice on how to best fit it in to the code base or other > > concerns, in order to get a DB "self-check" f

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 18:30, Julian Foad wrote: > I'm planning to commit the attached wc-db-verification-1.patch, subject > to any advice on how to best fit it in to the code base or other > concerns, in order to get a DB "self-check" function started. > > I think we need something like this.  Ea

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Greg Stein
>... > I would suggest adding a new function for this purpose; and maybe a separate > program to call it for our beta cycle. Please... not another program. There was also a recent call for 'svn upgrade' to be separate. It really sucks to have an installation smear a dozen programs into your system

RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-10 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 02:12 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] > > Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 1:16 > > To: Julian Foad > > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] WC

RE: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 10 mei 2011 1:16 > To: Julian Foad > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1 > > Could we tie it into cleanup? Then other tools like

Re: [PATCH] WC DB verification 1

2011-05-09 Thread Mark Phippard
Could we tie it into cleanup? Then other tools like TortoiseSVN, Subclipse, AnkhSVN could invoke it too. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > I'm planning to commit the attached wc-db-verification-1.patch, subject > to any advice on how to best fit it in to the code base or othe