RE: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2010-02-15 Thread Jon Foster
Hi, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:14:08PM -, Jon Foster wrote: > > Add --using-external-locking option to svnsync. > Hi Jon, > > I've finally found time to take a look at this. Sorry for taking so > long. I have committed your patch in r910212, with some tweaks. Thankyo

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2010-02-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:14:08PM -, Jon Foster wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed on this list, we don't always need svnsync's networked > lock. If svnsync only runs on a single server, the administrator > can use the "flock" tool to prevent running multiple copies of > svnsync at the same time.

RE: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-11 Thread Jon Foster
Hi, Julian Foad wrote: > Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 > > Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I > have a couple of suggestion

RE: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-11 Thread Jon Foster
Hi, -Original Message- From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com] Sent: 09 December 2009 13:11 To: Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis Cc: Jon Foster; dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wro

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-10 Thread Julian Foad
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: > On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote: [...] > > 1. It's probably a good idea to point out in these emails that logging > > the patch into the issue tracker does not very much increase the chance > > of it being applied, it just makes it easier for us to keep tr

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-09 Thread Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis
Hi Julian, On 10/12/2009, at 00:11 , Julian Foad wrote: > Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 >> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 > > Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-09 Thread Julian Foad
Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis wrote: > Hi Jon, > > I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Hi Gavin. It's great that you are keeping these patches under control. I have a couple of suggestions: 1. It's probably a good idea to poin

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-09 Thread Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis
Hi Jon, I have logged your patch into the issue tracker: #3545 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3545 Gavin On 28/11/2009, at 03:32 , Jon Foster wrote: > [Very sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments > and mangling inline patches by word-wrapping them. > Try

Re: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-12-03 Thread Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis
Ping. This Patch submission has received no comments. Gavin. On 28/11/2009, at 03:32 , Jon Foster wrote: > [Very sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments > and mangling inline patches by word-wrapping them. > Trying yet again, with patch as a ZIP file.] > > Hi, > > As discussed

RE: [PATCH] Add svnsync --use-external-locking option

2009-11-27 Thread Jon Foster
[Sorry, my mailserver appears to be dropping attachments today. Trying again, with patch inline at end of the mail] Hi, As discussed on this list, we don't always need svnsync's networked lock. If svnsync only runs on a single server, the administrator can use the "flock" tool to prevent runnin