On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:05AM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
> Consider >this< my typical potty-mouth response. I'll skip the
> actuals, and move along in peace...
Save it for later. I'll ask for more next time we have a drink together :)
On 14.12.2012 07:38, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
> On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
>> getting std::shared_ptr . The C++ bindings I'm slowly
>> wrapping my head around will need it, and I don't want to even
>> consider using stan
On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
getting std::shared_ptr . The C++ bindings I'm slowly wrapping
my head around will need it, and I don't want to even consider using
standard containers without it. The only alternative to C
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>...
> P.S.: Nothing wrong with Boost as such, of course; but including
> tends to pull in some 90% of Boost's headers, and
> I consider that overkill.
I'll go on record with "Boost is the Automake of C++. Tons of useless
crap that you don't
On 14.12.2012 02:32, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
>> and set flags on *nix:
>>
>> * Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
>> over gcc/g++.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
> and set flags on *nix:
>
> * Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
> over gcc/g++.
> * Set standards-compliance mode (C90/C++11) ev
> * Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
> over gcc/g++.
Is clang considered superior, then? Fair enough, I haven't really kept
up.
> * Add -pipe to C(XX)FLAGS if the compiler supports it. This speeds up
> compilation a bit in my tests.
Hmm. It seem
Branko Čibej writes:
> {{{
> * build/ac-macros/compiler.m4: New file.
> (SVN_PROG_CC, SVN_CFLAGS_ADD_IFELSE,
>SVN_PROG_CXX, SVN_CXXFLAGS_ADD_IFELSE): New.
> * aclocal.m4: Include build/ac-macros/compiler.m4.
>
> * configure.ac:
> - Use SVN_PROG_CC instead of AC_PROG_CC
> - Use SVN_PROG_
The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
and set flags on *nix:
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over gcc/g++.
* Set standards-compliance mode (C90/C++11) even without maintainer-mode.
* Add -pipe to C(XX)FLAGS if the com
9 matches
Mail list logo
