On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> If you consider all this, the easiest approach by far might be to simply
> add a Lucene index of all log messages to the server, then you can and
> any number of bells and whistles including language-specific stemming.
> I'd consider that a
On 23.04.2013 14:51, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:27:08PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> You're missing the point. tolower() works on individual characters, not
>> whole strings; so it in general /cannot/ do correct locale-specific
> Do you really mean characters, or bytes?
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:27:08PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> You're missing the point. tolower() works on individual characters, not
> whole strings; so it in general /cannot/ do correct locale-specific
Do you really mean characters, or bytes?
It sounds like you mean bytes. tolower() works on i
On 23.04.2013 08:53, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:13:43PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 22.04.2013 12:59, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> The assertion shows a design problem which we should handle for future
>>> compatibility and you suggest just adding some bandages to patch/hi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:13:43PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 22.04.2013 12:59, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > The assertion shows a design problem which we should handle for future
> > compatibility and you suggest just adding some bandages to patch/hide the
> > test failure?
> >
> > The current c
april 2013 00:08
>>>> To: Ivan Zhakov
>>>> Cc: Branko Čibej; Bert Huijben; dev@subversion.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:11:14PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
&
> -Original Message-
> From: 'Stefan Sperling' [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 22 april 2013 11:46
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Ivan Zhakov'; 'Branko Čibej'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk a
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:11:14PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > > So I propose the following plan:
> > > 1. Make 'log --search" case-sensitive in trunk and 1.8.x.
> > > 2. Merge
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 22 april 2013 00:08
> To: Ivan Zhakov
> Cc: Branko Čibej; Bert Huijben; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>
> On Sun, Apr 21,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:11:14PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> So I propose the following plan:
> 1. Make 'log --search" case-sensitive in trunk and 1.8.x.
> 2. Merge utf8proc stuff to trunk
> 3. Implement svn_utf__casefold() using utf8proc
> 4. Implement 'log --isearch' using
No --isearch please.
21 apr 2013 kl. 20.07 skrev Branko Čibej:
Yes, the obvious ones are German (ß == SS) equivalence and turkic (i
==
İ) and (ı == I) equivalences (and that's aready three characters);
but
then in French, lowercase accented letters are equivalent to uppercase
unaccented letters, whereas for exam
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Note that Unicode 3.2 (where these links point to) is over 10 years old. The
> current version is 6.2... and things haven’t got easier with newer versions.
>
Good point. But it seems there is no big difference in this area.
> A different rou
Note that Unicode 3.2 (where these links point to) is over 10 years old. The
current version is 6.2... and things haven’t got easier with newer versions.
A different route would be to convert the characters from our utf-8 to the
native platform encoding (using our existing apis for that) and th
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.04.2013 17:11, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 21.04.2013 14:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I'd rather pull the case
On 21.04.2013 17:11, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 21.04.2013 14:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
I'd rather pull the case insensitive search part of this new in 1.8 search
feat
On 21.04.2013 15:37, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: zondag 21 april 2013 14:48
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>>
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.04.2013 14:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> I'd rather pull the case insensitive search part of this new in 1.8 search
>>> feature and do it right in 1.9.
>> What's the issu
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> I'd rather pull the case insensitive search part of this new in 1.8 search
>> feature and do it right in 1.9.
>
> What's the issue with the current implementation apart from
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Do we want case folding (or at least case variant compare) support in our
> libraries for 1.8?
>
No.
> Or is this 1.9+ scope?
>
Yes. =)
My $.02. -- justin
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: zondag 21 april 2013 14:48
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>
> On 21.04.2013 14:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Sun,
On 21.04.2013 14:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> I'd rather pull the case insensitive search part of this new in 1.8 search
>> feature and do it right in 1.9.
> What's the issue with the current implementation apart from the
> test fail
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: zondag 21 april 2013 14:05
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Branko Čibej'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>
> On Sun, Apr
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:53:43PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I'd rather pull the case insensitive search part of this new in 1.8 search
> feature and do it right in 1.9.
What's the issue with the current implementation apart from the
test failures on Windows?
The behaviour of 'svn log --searc
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: zaterdag 20 april 2013 18:40
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>
> On 20.04.2013 18:30, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > On Sat, Ap
On 20.04.2013 18:30, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 20.04.2013 17:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:2
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.04.2013 17:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> How is low
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.04.2013 17:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
How is lower-casing a multi-byte UTF-8 character going to help?
On 20.04.2013 17:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> How is lower-casing a multi-byte UTF-8 character going to help?
>>> Won't the lower-case equivalent still be a multibyte charact
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > How is lower-casing a multi-byte UTF-8 character going to help?
> > Won't the lower-case equivalent still be a multibyte character
> > and trigger the overflow check in Visual
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:15:17PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got following failures when running Debug build with VC 2010:
>> FAIL: log_tests.py 40: test 'svn log -g --search'
>> FAIL: log_tests.py 39: 'svn log --search'
>>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 20 apr 2013 kl. 12.27 skrev Stefan Sperling:
>
> >>W: f:\dd\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\isctype.c(68) : Assertion
> >>failed: (unsigned)(c + 1) <= 256
> >>]]]
> >
> >Seems like a bogus check to me. Is there a notion of debug
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@apache.org]
> Sent: zaterdag 20 april 2013 12:28
> To: Ivan Zhakov
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: log --search test failures on trunk and 1.8.x
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:15:17PM +0400, I
20 apr 2013 kl. 12.27 skrev Stefan Sperling:
W: f:\dd\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\isctype.c(68) : Assertion
failed: (unsigned)(c + 1) <= 256
]]]
Seems like a bogus check to me. Is there a notion of debug vs. release
builds in Visual Studio, and if so, does this happen in release mode
buil
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:15:17PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got following failures when running Debug build with VC 2010:
> FAIL: log_tests.py 40: test 'svn log -g --search'
> FAIL: log_tests.py 39: 'svn log --search'
>
> They fail because of assertion in VC runtime:
> [[[
> W: f:\
34 matches
Mail list logo
