On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi, Stefan,
>
> Von: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com]
> >> What's the performance penalty for modifying a packed rev props? From
> what you've said, it sounds like packing works by fitting as many rev props
> into a 64k
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Trent Nelson wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>
> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> > and finally implemented revprop packing
>
> Lots of tools, like svnsync, store metadata in r0 rev props. Could this
> rev be excluded from packing?
>
It is exclu
Hi Stefan,
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing
Lots of tools, like svnsync, store metadata in r0 rev props. Could this
rev be excluded from packing?
What's the performance penalty for modifying a packed rev props? From
what you'v
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin <
> philip.mar...@wandisco.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >>
> >> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> >> > and finally implem
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>
>> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>>
>> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
>> > and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
>> > offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> > and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> > offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
>
> There are buildbot failure
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
There are buildbot failures, I don't know if they are caused by the
packing code. valgrind
Hi Stefan,
Why do you use a default of 64k for a revprop pack?
Isn't something like 1MB a more sensible default? I would guess that for the
1000 revisions we usually pack that would fit in a single pack, while with
64K you only can get a few tens/hundreds revisions in a pack,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
>
> It's design deviates from the existing revprop
On 7/6/12 6:27 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi devs,
This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
Sinc
On 07/06/2012 04:32 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This week I had one of my "how hard can it be?" moments
> and finally implemented revprop packing (did that mainly
> offline). It passes all tests and seems to work pretty well.
Cool!
[...]
> Since the new code will not be used unles
11 matches
Mail list logo
