On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> Alright. I gave it a bit more thought now.
>>
>> Whenever we encounter this mismatch, something pretty
>> bad likely happened to the repo - such as a failed restore
>> attempt. In turn, we can expect those situations t
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Alright. I gave it a bit more thought now.
>
> Whenever we encounter this mismatch, something pretty
> bad likely happened to the repo - such as a failed restore
> attempt. In turn, we can expect those situations to be
> very rare - which means we can afford some disruption
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote:
> >> @@ -2262,14 +2264,20 @@ get_shared_rep(representation_t **old_re
> >>
> >>/* A simple guard against general rep-cache induced corruption. */
> >>if ((*old_rep)->expanded_size != rep->e
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> + /* ### Would it be faster (and so better) to just try reading it,
>> + and handle ENOENT, instead of first checking for presence? */
>>SVN_ERR(svn_io_check_path(file_name, &kind, scratch_pool));
>>if (kind == svn_node
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c(revision 1681856)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c(working copy)
Hi Bert.
Bert Huijben wrote:
> On Windows opening the file is sensitive to outside interactions and may
> trigger a retry loop. [...] A filestat is +- a constant time operation that
> doesn't have these problems.
OK...
> So this really depends on how common all cases are. If not existing or
> po
On Windows opening the file is sensitive to outside interactions and may
trigger a retry loop. E.g. A virusscanber that scans every file before opening
by hooking the OS. A filestat is +- a constant time operation that doesn't have
these problems.
So this really depends on how common all cases
7 matches
Mail list logo
