> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:42 -0400, 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
> > Are you refering to sole Kerberos or are you just concerned about
> > transport encryption? Your statement somewhat irritates me.
> > Given that the HTTP traffic cannot be securely wrapped into the GSS
> > content and nor the SASL Q
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:42 -0400, 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
> Are you refering to sole Kerberos or are you just concerned about
> transport encryption? Your statement somewhat irritates me.
> Given that the HTTP traffic cannot be securely wrapped into the GSS
> content and nor the SASL QOP can be
> Betreff: RE: Proxy authentication with Negotiate uses wrong host
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 05:52 -0400, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > Then somebody added Kerberos support to neon, but the api wasn't
> > updated to allow different behavior for the specific implementations.
Bert,
> > -Original Message-
> > From: 1983-01...@gmx.net [mailto:1983-01...@gmx.net]
> > Sent: woensdag 24 augustus 2011 10:47
> > To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Proxy authentication with Negotiate uses wrong host
> >
> >
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 05:52 -0400, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Then somebody added Kerberos support to neon, but the api wasn't
> updated to allow different behavior for the specific implementations.
Kerberos via HTTP negotiate is also insecure when not used over HTTPS.
In HTTP negotiate, the GSSAPI mec
> -Original Message-
> From: 1983-01...@gmx.net [mailto:1983-01...@gmx.net]
> Sent: woensdag 24 augustus 2011 10:47
> To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proxy authentication with Negotiate uses wrong host
>
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:25:49AM +
6 matches
Mail list logo
