on.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Feature wish/request: [--externals MODE] switch on update
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Roman Kellner
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Did some more testing and found the following:
> >
> > Setup. folder "withexter
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Roman Kellner wrote:
> Hi
>
> Did some more testing and found the following:
>
> Setup. folder "withexternals" has prop svn:externals with a number of
> revisioned and un-revisioned externals files.
>
> What happens:
>
> checkout folder "withexternals" -> all revisi
nal location is stated in
the .svn/entries file.
I guess the info was available in the WC.
---Roman
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:56:43 +0200
> Von: "Roman Kellner"
> An: Julian Foad , sbut...@elego.de
>
On 06.05.2011 12:08, Philip Martin wrote:
> "Roman Kellner" writes:
>
>> But what about the features I wish/request. Do they somehow exist, are they
>> in the pipeline or do you consider them rubbish?
> You didn't answer the question about why using '-r N' or '@N' in an
> external does not do wha
Please see in your text.
---Roman
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:13:30 +0100
> Von: Julian Foad
> An: Stephen Butler
> CC: Roman , "Branko Čibej" ,
> dev@subversion.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Feature wish/req
-Roman
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 06 May 2011 12:39:53 +0200
> Von: "Branko Čibej"
> An: Philip Martin
> CC: Roman Kellner , Bert Huijben ,
> julian.f...@wandisco.com, dev@subversion.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Feature wish/request
OK, now we understand. At first I assumed you were running "update" on
the root of the main working copy. When you run "update" on the
external directory itself, then I expect it to update to head. This is
because, as the book says, the external directory behaves as a separate
working copy.
You
On 06.05.2011 12:25, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
>> On 06.05.2011 12:08, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> "Roman Kellner" writes:
>>>
But what about the features I wish/request. Do they somehow exist, are
they
in the pipeline or do you consider them rubbish?
>>> You did
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 06.05.2011 12:08, Philip Martin wrote:
>> "Roman Kellner" writes:
>>
>>> But what about the features I wish/request. Do they somehow exist, are they
>>> in the pipeline or do you consider them rubbish?
>> You didn't answer the question about why using '-r N' or '@N' in
"Roman Kellner" writes:
> But what about the features I wish/request. Do they somehow exist, are they
> in the pipeline or do you consider them rubbish?
You didn't answer the question about why using '-r N' or '@N' in an
external does not do what you need. If your client doesn't respect the
re
"
> An: "'Branko Čibej'" , "'Roman'"
> CC: "'Julian Foad'" , dev@subversion.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Feature wish/request: [--externals MODE] switch on update
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
&
On May 6, 2011, at 11:06 , Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 23:18 +0200, Roman wrote:
>> Hi Branko, hi Julian
>>
>> @Branko: I know the -r feature of the svn:externals and it worked fine
>> on checkout (both formats <1.5 and >=1.5). But when updating the without
>> special switches i
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 23:18 +0200, Roman wrote:
> Hi Branko, hi Julian
>
> @Branko: I know the -r feature of the svn:externals and it worked fine
> on checkout (both formats <1.5 and >=1.5). But when updating the without
> special switches it did update to the head regardless whether the
> exte
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
> Sent: donderdag 5 mei 2011 23:40
> To: Roman
> Cc: Julian Foad; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature wish/request: [--externals MODE] switch on update
>
> Ha.
Ha. That quote from SVNbook is relevant.
I would assume that this "feature" could be fixed in 1.7, since there is
no longer a separate, disjoint "external working copy"?
-- Brane
On 05.05.2011 23:18, Roman wrote:
> Hi Branko, hi Julian
>
> @Branko: I know the -r feature of the svn:externals and
Hi Branko, hi Julian
@Branko: I know the -r feature of the svn:externals and it worked fine
on checkout (both formats <1.5 and >=1.5). But when updating the without
special switches it did update to the head regardless whether the
external was pinned to a revision or not.
To be honest, we did
Hi Roman.
Branko Čibej wrote:
> You can already pin an external to a particular version by adding a -r
> parameter to the definition in svn:externals.
>
> -- Brane
>
> On 05.05.2011 09:42, muzu...@gmx.net wrote:
> > 1. Feature update [--externals MODE] switch:
> >
You can already pin an external to a particular version by adding a -r
parameter to the definition in svn:externals.
-- Brane
On 05.05.2011 09:42, muzu...@gmx.net wrote:
> Normal0falsefalsefalse
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
