On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 12:20:22AM -0800, Bert Huijben wrote:
> You don't need a wq item to just update the db. Wq items are to keep
> the wc and db synchronized. To keep the db itself synchronized we have
> sqlite transactions
Duh, of course! Thanks for the cluebat, Bert.
So, Julian, your patch
t: Re: [PATCH] Rough cut at update-move support for properties
In r1418585 I committed a much better version of this, and a test which passes.
It's still not right -- it's putting the props into the DB
immediately, whereas it should be adding another work item to the work
queue instead -- b
In r1418585 I committed a much better version of this, and a test which passes.
It's still not right -- it's putting the props into the DB immediately, whereas
it should be adding another work item to the work queue instead -- but it's a
start.
- Julian
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> I'm just po
Ben Reser
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> I'm just posting this so you (Philip et el.) can take a look if you
>> want to. I might proceed by extending the tests to check props and
>> then committing it if it works, but really I want to factor it better
>> -- maybe by reusing svn_wc_merge5() or the gut
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I'm just posting this so you (Philip et el.) can take a look if you want to.
> I might proceed by extending the tests to check props and then committing it
> if it works, but really I want to factor it better -- maybe by reusing
> svn_wc_mer
5 matches
Mail list logo
