Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-28 Thread Julian Foad
On Tue, 2010-01-26, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > Julian Foad writes: > > Paul Burba wrote: > >> Also, would you mind taking a stab at expanding the test to cover > >> Alan's original problem? Specifically that a second working copy, > >> when updated, gets both the move destination *and* the source

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-26 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Julian Foad writes: > Paul Burba wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: >> > + # Move new added file to another one and commit. >> > + second_path = os.path.join(new_path, 'second') >> > + rav_svn(None, None, [], 'move', first_path, second_path) >> > + rav_svn(Non

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-25 Thread Julian Foad
Paul Burba wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > + # Move new added file to another one and commit. > > + second_path = os.path.join(new_path, 'second') > > + rav_svn(None, None, [], 'move', first_path, second_path) > > + rav_svn(None, None, ["Committed revision

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-25 Thread Paul Burba
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > Julian, > > Please find attached test case patch for this scenario in trunk. > > [[[ > Log: > > New XFail test case for reverse merge move scenario. Rename fails after > reverting a commit using reverse merge. This issue need to be fixed

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-25 Thread Julian Foad
Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > @@ -4352,7 +4390,8 @@ > > path_copy_in_repo_2475, > > commit_copy_depth_empty, > > copy_below_copy, > > - XFail(move_below_move) > > + XFail(move_bel

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-25 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-12-17, Alan Spencer wrote: >>> I've been asked to analyse a problem we have had with subversion and >>> come to the conclusion there is a bug in at least the client. >>> >>> >>> The scenario was someone committed a new dire

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-24 Thread Noorul Islam K M
> On Thu, 2009-12-17, Alan Spencer wrote: >> I've been asked to analyse a problem we have had with subversion and >> come to the conclusion there is a bug in at least the client. >> >> >> The scenario was someone committed a new directory that made a build >> fail and in order to free up the bu

Re: Probable bug with svn copy

2010-01-13 Thread Julian Foad
Hi Alan. Thanks for this report, and sorry for the long time to respond. I finally got around to converting your recipe into an executable script (on Linux) which is attached, and with this it is easy to reproduce the problem. On Thu, 2009-12-17, Alan Spencer wrote: > I've been asked to analyse

Probable bug with svn copy

2009-12-17 Thread Alan Spencer
Hi All, I've been asked to analyse a problem we have had with subversion and come to the conclusion there is a bug in at least the client. The scenario was someone committed a new directory that made a build fail and in order to free up the build this commit was reverse merges (merge -c -)