Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-15 Thread Greg Stein
On Mar 15, 2012 9:22 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote: > > On 03/14/2012 02:28 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > > "C. Michael Pilato" writes: > >> What happens in the opposite case -- that is, when you have a > >> branch-based working copy and you move something, then use a stable > >> 1.7 client to acces

Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-15 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 03/14/2012 02:28 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > "C. Michael Pilato" writes: >> What happens in the opposite case -- that is, when you have a >> branch-based working copy and you move something, then use a stable >> 1.7 client to access it? > > The stable 1.7 client will ignore the moved-to/here co

Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 16:01, Stefan Sperling wrote: >... > This only affects working copies which contain moves recorded by > a trunk svn client. Once the branch is reintegrated, those moves > will stop working as expected. > > Given that the current target audience of trunk clients is reading >

Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:28:40PM +, Philip Martin wrote: > "C. Michael Pilato" writes: > > > On 03/14/2012 01:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > >> $ svn mv wc/A/g wc/g # using trunk > >> A wc/g > >> D wc/A/f > >> $ svn st wc # using trunk > >> D wc/A/f > >>

Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-14 Thread Philip Martin
"C. Michael Pilato" writes: > On 03/14/2012 01:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote: >> $ svn mv wc/A/g wc/g # using trunk >> A wc/g >> D wc/A/f >> $ svn st wc # using trunk >> D wc/A/f >> > moved to wc/g >> A +wc/g >> > moved from wc/A/f >> >> If we n

Re: Possible WC format bump

2012-03-14 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 03/14/2012 01:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > $ svn mv wc/A/g wc/g # using trunk > A wc/g > D wc/A/f > $ svn st wc # using trunk > D wc/A/f > > moved to wc/g > A +wc/g > > moved from wc/A/f > > If we now use the branch on that working copy: >

Possible WC format bump

2012-03-14 Thread Philip Martin
phi...@apache.org writes: > Author: philip > Date: Wed Mar 14 17:13:42 2012 > New Revision: 1300647 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1300647&view=rev > Log: > On multi-layer-move branch, remove an excessively strict check and allow > a node to be both moved_to and moved_here. copy_tests