Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:44:54 +:
> Bob Archer writes:
>
> >> Suppose I have a directory tree:
> >>
> >> foo/
> >> bar/
> >> zig
> >>
> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar.
> >> What
> >> should "svn revert --depth=files foo
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:47:04 +0100:
> On 10.02.2011 17:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> >> Suppose I have a directory tree:
> >>
> >> foo/
> >> bar/
> >> zig
> >>
> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it b
> Bob Archer writes:
>
> >> Suppose I have a directory tree:
> >>
> >> foo/
> >> bar/
> >> zig
> >>
> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar.
> >> What
> >> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert
> >> foo/bar?
> >> How much of foo/bar
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: donderdag 10 februari 2011 19:57
> To: Philip Martin
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Partially recursive revert when node kind changes
>
> > Bob Archer writes:
> Bob Archer writes:
>
> >> Suppose I have a directory tree:
> >>
> >> foo/
> >> bar/
> >> zig
> >>
> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar.
> >> What
> >> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert
> >> foo/bar?
> >> How much of foo/bar
Bob Archer writes:
>> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>>
>> foo/
>> bar/
>> zig
>>
>> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar.
>> What
>> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert
>> foo/bar?
>> How much of foo/bar should it restore?
>
>
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>>
>> foo/
>> bar/
>> zig
>>
>> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
>> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/
> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>
> foo/
> bar/
> zig
>
> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar.
> What
> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert
> foo/bar?
> How much of foo/bar should it restore?
You have done the following:
1. De
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 10.02.2011 17:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>>>
>>> foo/
>>> bar/
>>> zig
>>>
>>> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
>>> should "svn reve
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 05:47:04PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.02.2011 17:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> >> Suppose I have a directory tree:
> >>
> >> foo/
> >> bar/
> >> zig
> >>
> >> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace i
On 10.02.2011 17:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>>
>> foo/
>> bar/
>> zig
>>
>> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
>> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should
On 02/10/2011 11:28 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Suppose I have a directory tree:
>
> foo/
> bar/
> zig
>
> and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
> should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/bar?
> How much of foo/bar should it res
Suppose I have a directory tree:
foo/
bar/
zig
and I delete the tree foo/bar and replace it by a file foo/bar. What
should "svn revert --depth=files foo" do? Should it revert foo/bar?
How much of foo/bar should it restore?
--
Philip
13 matches
Mail list logo