Re: Optimizing properties for checkout/update with ra_serf

2012-06-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/08/2012 04:28 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > or may not have. In actuality, due to the PROPFIND requirement, > ra_serf still issues a HEAD request - but, we don't need the actual > content saving a huge bunch of bandwidth on an update case if the > pristine already exists locally. This also

Re: Optimizing properties for checkout/update with ra_serf

2012-06-08 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/08/2012 04:28 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > So, in response to the request, mod_dav_svn does: > > - Just like it's response to ra_neon, the server will produce an XML > document listing what changes need to happen locally on the client. > > - However, it does not inline the content or th

Optimizing properties for checkout/update with ra_serf

2012-06-08 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
To help kick off the hackathon discussions next week in Berlin, I'd like to nudge the collective braintrust by writing down some thoughts about optimizing the ra_serf protocol used when checking/updating out a working copy. (I should arrive in Berlin late on Monday.) As Philip has pointed out, th