Re: Obliterate - an elementary case is now working

On Sun, 2009-12-27, David Glasser wrote: > That's great to hear! > > What's the effect on WCs? Do WCs with the bad rev get "fixed" on > update? Do WCs that never had the bad rev skip over it fine? Hi Dave. At the moment, WCs with the bad rev get broken in some way that I have yet to investigate.

Re: Obliterate - an elementary case is now working

That's great to hear! What's the effect on WCs? Do WCs with the bad rev get "fixed" on update? Do WCs that never had the bad rev skip over it fine? --dave On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > Hi, Obliterate fans. > > As of r893267, if you compile with "-DSVN_WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_

Re: Obliterate - an elementary case is now working

On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 19:21 +, Julian Foad wrote: > Hi, Obliterate fans. > > As of r893267, if you compile with "-DSVN_WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_OBLITERATE", > you get an "svn obliterate" subcommand which is capable of obliterating > the latest revision of a file. In my tests so far, it seems to work

Obliterate - an elementary case is now working

Hi, Obliterate fans. As of r893267, if you compile with "-DSVN_WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_OBLITERATE", you get an "svn obliterate" subcommand which is capable of obliterating the latest revision of a file. In my tests so far, it seems to work in very limited circumstances. You can run the "obliterate_test