Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-03 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:45:25AM -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote: > Before investigating too much further, I see that Makefile.svn is > downloading an antique bdb 4.7.25. From the Subversion 1.13.0-rc1 > signing emails [1], I see that Brane runs his tests with the newest, > 18.1.32. So I'll try that

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-02 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 1:03 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:44 +00:00: > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Daniel Shahaf > > wrote: > > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:45:25 -0500: > > > > Regarding the one test failure I had (autoprop_t

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:44 +00:00: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:45:25 -0500: > > > Regarding the one test failure I had (autoprop_tests.py 7 with > > > [svn x bdb]), I've had two more since, both wi

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-02 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:45:25 -0500: > > Regarding the one test failure I had (autoprop_tests.py 7 with > > [svn x bdb]), I've had two more since, both with bdb. These are > > intermittent database errors and occur in

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:45:25 -0500: > Regarding the one test failure I had (autoprop_tests.py 7 with > [svn x bdb]), I've had two more since, both with bdb. These are > intermittent database errors and occur in varying places. (All fsfs > tests have passed every time.) Ac

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2020-01-02 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 12:13 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 15:39:10 -0500: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:41 AM Daniel Shahaf > > wrote: > > > Forgot to say this earlier, but you might try running a threaded > > > svnserve. In > > > plain trunk that's

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 15:39:10 -0500: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:41 AM Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 17:02:21 -0500: > > > (If you're wondering about /dev/sdb1, it appears to be a regular disk, > > > not a ramdrive, because this i

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 03:39:10PM -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote: > There is a variable THREADING in the makefile; it defaults to yes and > activates threading and thread-safety stuff in apr, gettext, ruby, and > sqlite. It has no effect on the Subversion build or tests. The svn-bb-openbsd buildbot

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-27 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:41 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 17:02:21 -0500: > > (If you're wondering about /dev/sdb1, it appears to be a regular disk, > > not a ramdrive, because this is a virtual machine and the ramdrive is > > a disk image in RAM on the h

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 17:02:21 -0500: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 12:04 PM Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > > Here are the contents of fails.log.svn-check-svn-bdb -- could be some > > > kind of fluke? I just started another full test run. Let's see if it > > > repeats: > > > > It's

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 12:04 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Here are the contents of fails.log.svn-check-svn-bdb -- could be some > > kind of fluke? I just started another full test run. Let's see if it > > repeats: > > It's _possible_ that some dependency upgrade introduced a heisenbug, but > Occam

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:48 +00:00: > One more question: Does anyone know which package(s) to install on > Debian to be able to run the JavaHL tests? Probably these: % apt-cache showsrc subversion | grep Build-Depends | vipe default-jdk-headless (>= 2:1.8) [!hurd-i386 !hppa !sp

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-26 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 6:00 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 02:37:03AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > It would be nice to find a way for you to share your changes without > > breaking > > the bot. Could you talk to stsp about this? > > Yes I can help here. Please share your

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 02:37:03AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 12:07:35 -0500: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:38 AM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > > wrote: > > > > > > On 2019/12/25 6:38, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > > When running the regression test suite via

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 12:07:35 -0500: > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:38 AM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > wrote: > > > > On 2019/12/25 6:38, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > When running the regression test suite via the 'svn-check' target of > > > tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn, is there

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-25 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:38 AM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > > On 2019/12/25 6:38, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > When running the regression test suite via the 'svn-check' target of > > tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn, is there a convenient way to see a > > "All tests successful"-type summary at the

Re: Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-24 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
On 2019/12/25 6:38, Nathan Hartman wrote: > When running the regression test suite via the 'svn-check' target of > tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn, is there a convenient way to see a > "All tests successful"-type summary at the very end? > > That is to say, is there a better way than what I'm do

Makefile.svn: a dumb question

2019-12-24 Thread Nathan Hartman
When running the regression test suite via the 'svn-check' target of tools/dev/unix-build/Makefile.svn, is there a convenient way to see a "All tests successful"-type summary at the very end? That is to say, is there a better way than what I'm doing now, which is: $ cat tests.log.* | grep ^FAIL