Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
>>> Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
>>> major changes.
>>
>> First I am looking for an overall descrip
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
> > Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
> > major changes.
>
> I have not reviewed, but looked at how to review it.
>
> First I am l
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 15:19:56 +0200:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 08:48:30 +0100:
> > > Again, you are missing the point. You are saying that there
> > > are lots of possible configurations and vari
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 15:10:00 +0100:
> Now, we are at a point were internal review is certainly
> welcome and will probably find more issues but the real
> test is using it in the real world, e.g. as part of an alpha
> release.
+1
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 08:48:30 +0100:
> > Again, you are missing the point. You are saying that there
> > are lots of possible configurations and various combinations.
> > I'm saying that we *are* actually able to test
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 15:19:56 +0200:
> So, no, running "make check" under more configurations (despite still
> being an improvement) won't make me more confident that FSFS7 is in
> release-shape. It simply doesn't test enough code paths.
[ I was not trying to imply that FSF
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 15:19:56 +0200:
> So, no, running "make check" under more configurations (despite still
> being an improvement) won't make me more confident that FSFS7 is in
> release-shape. It simply doesn't test enough code paths.
[ I was not trying to imply that FSF
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 15:19:56 +0200:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 08:48:30 +0100:
> > Again, you are missing the point. You are saying that there
> > are lots of possible configurations and various combinations.
> > I'm saying that we *are* actually able to
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 08:48:30 +0100:
> Again, you are missing the point. You are saying that there
> are lots of possible configurations and various combinations.
> I'm saying that we *are* actually able to test many variants.
> One simply needs to update their overall test
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 28 November 2013 10:22, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot, Philip!
> >> > I plan on merging the branch later this week (Friday-ish).
> >> >
> >> Well, I still think that log-addressing branch should *NOT* be mer
On 28 November 2013 10:22, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot, Philip!
>> > I plan on merging the branch later this week (Friday-ish).
>> >
>> Well, I still think that log-addressing branch should *NOT* be merged
>> and all FS _performance_ and format changes should be implemente
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 25 November 2013 17:44, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 23 A
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
> Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
> major changes.
I have not reviewed, but looked at how to review it.
First I am looking for an overall description of the changes. The BRANCH-README
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 25 November 2013 17:44, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 23 A
On 25 November 2013 17:44, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 23 August 2013 03:21, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> >
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> >> On 23 August 2013 03:21, Stefan Fuhrmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
> >> > Ple
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
>> On 23 August 2013 03:21, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
>> > Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
>> > major changes.
>> >
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 23 August 2013 03:21, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
> > Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
> > major changes.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I wi
On 23 August 2013 03:21, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
> Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
> major changes.
>
> If there are no objections, I will merge the code in the week
> of Sep 23th.
>
Hi Stefan,
I have looked
Hi all,
As of r1516665, work on this branch has been completed.
Please review. See the BRANCH-README for the list of
major changes.
If there are no objections, I will merge the code in the week
of Sep 23th.
-- Stefan^2.
20 matches
Mail list logo
