On 07/01/2011 09:56 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> I plan to apply the second patch in the issue, it restores the 1.6
> libtool detection and fixes the the --with-experimental-libtool problem.
There's a Nike slogan which comes to mind right about now...
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.col
I plan to apply the second patch in the issue, it restores the 1.6
libtool detection and fixes the the --with-experimental-libtool problem.
The code did require maintenance in the past, and may require
maintenance in the future, but it hasn't required any maintenance in the
last three years on the
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> The code in question is present on the 1.6 branch and we have been
>> releasing it periodically without much problem. The most recent change
>> I can identify appears to be r870104 dated 2008-03-24.
>
> At th
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> The code in question is present on the 1.6 branch and we have been
> releasing it periodically without much problem. The most recent change
> I can identify appears to be r870104 dated 2008-03-24.
At the time (not verified on subsequent rel
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> I don't expect that the situation has improved since I tossed
> it...but, if others want to maintain it, go for it. But, expect that
> you're going to be spending lots of time (as I did) trying to get
> every edge case of a platform to work.
The code in question is p
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> As I recall, the problem is that we have to continually tweak things.
> Over and over and over. Edge cases never stop with libtool. It creates
> a continual maintenance nightmare.
Right.
libtool constantly requires lots of handholding to get i
Philip Martin writes:
> Greg Stein writes:
>
>> What *does* seem to be undisputed is that OpenSUSE has a broken
>> libtool installation that doesn't handle C++. Why are we working
>> around that?
>
> Subversion requires C++ support and APR doesn't. C++ support in libtool
> is optional. Can Sub
Greg Stein writes:
> What *does* seem to be undisputed is that OpenSUSE has a broken
> libtool installation that doesn't handle C++. Why are we working
> around that?
Subversion requires C++ support and APR doesn't. C++ support in libtool
is optional. Can Subversion expect APR's libtool to sup
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:48, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:22:09AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
>> marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
>> opinions about th
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:22:09AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
> marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
> opinions about the correct path forward. The complaint involves some code
>
Issue #3930 [1] ("build system assumes that APR libtool supports C++") is
marked as a 1.7.0 blocker, but is currently being held up by difference of
opinions about the correct path forward. The complaint involves some code
that was removed from the codebase some time ago. We have no record as to
11 matches
Mail list logo
