> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: woensdag 15 augustus 2012 18:22
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
>
> Hello, all.
>
> Echoing in the back of my head are promises
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:21 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
> release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
> ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various sta
On Aug 16, 2012 9:43 AM, "Mat Booth" wrote:
> Aren't you able to do this with path-based authorisation?
Or a commit hook if you really want to use properties.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
> release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
> ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various st
rasey [mailto:cedric.bra...@planet-side.co.uk]
> Cc: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com], dev@subversion.apache.org
> [mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org]
> Sent: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:16:45 +
>
> Subject: Re: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
>
> Thanks for that reminder!
: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
Thanks for that reminder! mphippard, pburba and I were just talking about
this yesterday as something we want to do for 1.8.
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 tracks this request.
On 08/15/2012 04:07 PM, Cedric JP. Brasey wrote:
> Please ple
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:21 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> PS: Is it safe to assume that "commit shelving/checkpointing" is *not*
> going to happen for 1.8? ;-)
I want to work on this functionality but don't think my time will free
up to work on it for at least another few weeks if not a month
On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Hello, all.
Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various states of
completion on
I've been looking at the compressed-pristines branch and I don't think
there's any chance it could be ready for 1.8; just thought I'd point
this out because compressed-pristines are listed in the 1.8 roadmap.
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/
t; Sent: 15/08/2012 19:46
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
>
> On 08/15/2012 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>>> Inherited Properties: Paul has
: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Finalizing the definition of 1.8.0
On 08/15/2012 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> Inherited Properties: Paul has the basic property inheritence and local
>> caching mechanism working on his branch, an
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> Inherited Properties: Paul has the basic property inheritence and local
>> caching mechanism working on his branch, and almost ready to begin
>> validating his approach by implementing one o
On 08/15/2012 12:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> Inherited Properties: Paul has the basic property inheritence and local
>> caching mechanism working on his branch, and almost ready to begin
>> validating his approach by implementing one of our wish
On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Inherited Properties: Paul has the basic property inheritence and local
> caching mechanism working on his branch, and almost ready to begin
> validating his approach by implementing one of our wishlist items (inherited
> default ignores, or inherit
Hello, all.
Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various states of
completion on the trunk, and I'd really like to avoid 1.8.0 r
15 matches
Mail list logo
