Re: CollabNet links in packages.html

2010-07-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > I object, unless we intend to rigorously police all of the other links > and keep the page up to date. I'm sure we can keep track of which third-party packages require registration. We already police the list to make sure that they keep the

Re: CollabNet links in packages.html

2010-07-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > order to download them.  Greg and I think we should add "(registration > required)" tags to the various CollabNet links on packages.html. > Objections? For any downloads that require registration, I think that is appropriate to denote. +1

Re: CollabNet links in packages.html

2010-07-09 Thread Julian Foad
Mark Phippard wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > A user on IRC seemed to be confused at the lack of Windows binaries > > from tigris.org, a link we recently removed. Now the first link on the > > list of Windows binaries is CollabNet, but registration is requir

Re: CollabNet links in packages.html

2010-07-09 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote: > A user on IRC seemed to be confused at the lack of Windows binaries > from tigris.org, a link we recently removed.  Now the first link on the > list of Windows binaries is CollabNet, but registration is required in > order to download them.

CollabNet links in packages.html

2010-07-09 Thread Peter Samuelson
A user on IRC seemed to be confused at the lack of Windows binaries from tigris.org, a link we recently removed. Now the first link on the list of Windows binaries is CollabNet, but registration is required in order to download them. Greg and I think we should add "(registration required)" tags