On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:21 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:03 PM Julian Foad wrote:
> > Yes, (2): it already checks for two error codes:
> >
> >((err->apr_err == SVN_ERR_CLIENT_UNRELATED_RESOURCES) ||
> > (err->apr_err == SVN_ERR_FS_NOT_FOUND)))
> >
> > we
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:03 PM Julian Foad wrote:
>
> TL;DR: Fixed and nominated for backport.
Thank you!!
More below...
> > (2) Alternately, perhaps svn_client_info4() should remain as-is and
> > instead same_resource_in_head() should change: Maybe under certain
> > conditions that
TL;DR: Fixed and nominated for backport.
I see it was a change I made that broke this case.
Filed as: http://subversion.apache.org/issue/4837
Test added: http://svn.apache.org/r1870393
More below...
Nathan Hartman wrote:
[...]
(1) This line in svn_client_info4():
SVN_ERR(same_resource_i
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:00 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Let's continue the discussion on dev@. [Moved from users@]
I didn't (much) get into the code yet except for a quick skim through
svn_client_info4().
If my understanding is correct, the change in r1823327 has to do
solely with reporting abou
Let's continue the discussion on dev@. [Moved from users@]
Ivan, would you like to write a regression test for this? See
subversion/tests/cmdline/info_tests.py.
Cheers,
Daniel
P.S. Nathan, are you aware of this syntax? — «svn log --diff -x-wp -c r1823327»
Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, Nov 22
5 matches
Mail list logo
