On Fri, 2011-02-11, Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote:
> >> There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between
> >> 1.6 and the current 1.7.
> >>
> >> In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if
Julian Foad writes:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote:
>> There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between
>> 1.6 and the current 1.7.
>>
>> In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if
>> the directory only has files it can be reverted usi
On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote:
> There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between
> 1.6 and the current 1.7.
>
> In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if
> the directory only has files it can be reverted using depth=files, if
> the dire
There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between
1.6 and the current 1.7.
In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if
the directory only has files it can be reverted using depth=files, if
the directory has empty immediate subdirs it can be reverted
4 matches
Mail list logo