Re: Beehaviour change between 1.6 and 1.7 when reverting copies

2011-02-11 Thread Julian Foad
On Fri, 2011-02-11, Philip Martin wrote: > Julian Foad writes: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote: > >> There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between > >> 1.6 and the current 1.7. > >> > >> In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if

Re: Beehaviour change between 1.6 and 1.7 when reverting copies

2011-02-11 Thread Philip Martin
Julian Foad writes: > On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote: >> There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between >> 1.6 and the current 1.7. >> >> In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if >> the directory only has files it can be reverted usi

Re: Beehaviour change between 1.6 and 1.7 when reverting copies

2011-02-11 Thread Julian Foad
On Thu, 2011-02-10, Philip Martin wrote: > There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between > 1.6 and the current 1.7. > > In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if > the directory only has files it can be reverted using depth=files, if > the dire

Beehaviour change between 1.6 and 1.7 when reverting copies

2011-02-10 Thread Philip Martin
There has been a behaviour change reverting copied directories between 1.6 and the current 1.7. In 1.7 the depth of the revert must match the depth of the copy, so if the directory only has files it can be reverted using depth=files, if the directory has empty immediate subdirs it can be reverted