Re: Re: [PATCH] Re: Ancestor directory permissions in authz

2014-12-15 Thread Hannes Reich
On 11/12/14 17:14, Branko Čibej wrote: > I have to admit I'm having a bit of trouble understanding what the > patch is supposed to do. Can you please explain, with examples, what > you're trying to achieve? Do the examples in my first mail of this thread help? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod

Re: [PATCH] Re: Ancestor directory permissions in authz

2014-12-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.12.2014 14:37, Hannes Reich wrote: > Thanks for the encouragement and background information. > > I've attached the patch, which I would describe as a workaround for > the underlying issue the authz-overhaul branch is addressing. > > Since the patch lacks authz-overhaul's concept of "list acc

[PATCH] Re: Ancestor directory permissions in authz

2014-12-11 Thread Hannes Reich
On 02/12/14 16:49, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On 11/28/2014 12:03 PM, Hannes Reich wrote: I'd like to suggest an extension to the authz file format to support the following scenario: * Some users of the repository should have access to everything, others should be restricted to a small set of

Re: Ancestor directory permissions in authz

2014-12-02 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/28/2014 12:03 PM, Hannes Reich wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to suggest an extension to the authz file format to support the > following scenario: > > * Some users of the repository should have access to everything, others > should be restricted to a small set of "public" directories. > > * All

Ancestor directory permissions in authz

2014-11-28 Thread Hannes Reich
Hi, I'd like to suggest an extension to the authz file format to support the following scenario: * Some users of the repository should have access to everything, others should be restricted to a small set of "public" directories. * All users should be able to check out from the same "root" di