On Mar 27, 2012 12:52 PM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:46:50AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2012 10:10 AM, "Markus Schaber"
> > > I hope that expert really is an expert.
> >
> > Yes, he is. John Viega.
>
> Funny how both of your wikipedia entries mention MUD.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:46:50AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2012 10:10 AM, "Markus Schaber"
> > I hope that expert really is an expert.
>
> Yes, he is. John Viega.
Funny how both of your wikipedia entries mention MUD.
Perhaps the upcoming generation of hackers will have first met i
Hi, Greg,
Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:23, Markus Schaber
> wrote:
> > Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> >> On Mar 27, 2012 12:55 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >> >...
> >> > > On 27.03.2012 05:23, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> > > >...
> >> > > > Whi
Hi,
Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
>On Mar 27, 2012 12:55 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >...
> > > On 27.03.2012 05:23, Greg Stein wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > While discussing this on IRC some, I did think of one case where you
> > > > want to know they got the correct master passphrase:
On Mar 27, 2012 10:10 AM, "Markus Schaber"
wrote:
>
> Hi, Gregs,
>
> Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
>
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > >...
> > > Unfortunately, there's more complexity in an encrypted password store
> > >than you probably anticipated, and it's
Hi, Gregs,
Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:45, Greg Hudson wrote:
> >...
> > Unfortunately, there's more complexity in an encrypted password store
> >than you probably anticipated, and it's definitely possible to lose
> >some or most of your intended securi
On 03/23/2012 10:28 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just my 5 ct:
>
> On 03/22/2012 01:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Is it now time to review the design doc on the wiki? I've been
>>> assuming it's WIP as I haven't seen a dev@ mail about this feature.
>
>> Review on the design doc is wel
Hi,
Just my 5 ct:
On 03/22/2012 01:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Is it now time to review the design doc on the wiki? I've been
>> assuming it's WIP as I haven't seen a dev@ mail about this feature.
> Review on the design doc is welcome, yes. I started to explicitly solicit as
> much, but I
8 matches
Mail list logo