On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>>>
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>>>
>>> 1) Failure:
>>> test_change
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>>
>> 1) Failure:
>> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
>> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buil
Joe Swatosh writes:
> From that perspective, it seems to me that the best approach is to use
> the Set in the test, but not in the bindings themselves. Also the
> current APIs don't provide order guarantees (obviously), but if they
> started to guarantee order in the future, the Set may be a bad
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Philip Martin
>>>
>>> We fix these by converting the arrays to sets so that the order is
>>> irrelevant. The open question is whether we do this solely within the
>>> testsuite, c
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:30:31 +0100:
>> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_wc.rb:764:in
>> `test_diff_callbacks_for_backward_compatibility':
>> <[[:dir_props_c
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:30:31 +0100:
> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_wc.rb:764:in
> `test_diff_callbacks_for_backward_compatibility':
> <[[:dir_props_changed,
> "/tmp/d20120327-16259-17t4nz8/wc",
> [# @n
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Philip Martin
>>
>> We fix these by converting the arrays to sets so that the order is
>> irrelevant. The open question is whether we do this solely within the
>> testsuite, changing both sides of the comparison, or whether we change
>> t
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>>
>> 1) Failure:
>> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
>> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buil
Philip Martin writes:
> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>
> 1) Failure:
> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/te
Joe Swatosh wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:36:16 -0700:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
> >
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
> >
> > 1) Failure:
> > test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnC
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>
> 1) Failure:
> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subvers
There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
1) Failure:
test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
/var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_client.rb:2296:in
`assert_change
12 matches
Mail list logo
