On 2/27/14, 2:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/27/14, 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Sure. Part of the reason to do an alpha is to get feedback on new features,
>>> particularly UI feedback. The auth subcommand happens to be one of those
>>> features that I think we could use user input on. If
On 2/27/14, 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Sure. Part of the reason to do an alpha is to get feedback on new features,
>> particularly UI feedback. The auth subcommand happens to be one of those
>> features that I think we could use user input on. If it's broken then it's
>> hard get that feed
On 27.02.2014 17:31, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/27/14, 4:29 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> There will always be problems :) I don't think holding off the alpha
>> release for a tiny feature being broken on windows is worth it.
>> There must be many more severe problems in the code that we don't
>> yet
On 2/27/14, 4:29 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> There will always be problems :) I don't think holding off the alpha
> release for a tiny feature being broken on windows is worth it.
> There must be many more severe problems in the code that we don't
> yet know about.
Sure. Part of the reason to do
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:22:12PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/25/14, 6:58 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> > Make that tomorrow. Got caught up in some other things today and didn't get
> > the tarball rolled.
>
> Going to hold off due to the `svn auth` changes today and some of the feedback
> going on
On 2/25/14, 6:58 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Make that tomorrow. Got caught up in some other things today and didn't get
> the tarball rolled.
Going to hold off due to the `svn auth` changes today and some of the feedback
going on there.
On 2/25/14, 10:27 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> In this vein and Bert's comment on IRC about needing 4 patches to make SilkSVN
> build based on 1.9.0-alpha1 I'm going to kill this one off and build a
> 1.9.0-alpha2 today.
Make that tomorrow. Got caught up in some other things today and didn't get
the ta
On 2/14/14, 11:44 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> So far we have two known issues with this tarball:
>
> svn-populate-node-origins-index doesn't build with Visual Studio 2010, 2012,
> or
> 2013 due to the ' in the project's descriptions. Bert found and fixed this in
> http://svn.apache.org/r1568180
>
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 00:41
>> To: Ben Reser
>> Cc: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: 1.9.0-alpha
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:39:08 +0100:
> Seems that mod_dontdothat is now required to run this test. It's
> enabled only on Windows. Bert added
>
> @SkipUnless(svntest.main.is_os_windows) # until the buildbots are configured
>
Looks like that stone has been left unturned
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2014 00:41
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wro
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and I
> wouldn
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: zaterdag 22 februari 2014 16:52
>> To: Johan Corveleyn
>> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: zaterdag 22 februari 2014 16:52
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.9.0-alpha1 up for testing/signing
>
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat,
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 15:46:21 +0100:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> > The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> > Please get the tarballs from
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> > and add your
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and I
> wouldn
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and I
> wouldn
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform
Mac OS X 10.9.1 Mavericks, build 13B42
Standard dependencies:
Apple clang(++) 5.0 (clang-500.2.79)/LLVM 3.3svn
APR 1.4.5
APR-Util 1.3.12
zlib 1.2.5
httpd 2.2.24
OpenSSL 0.9.8y
Python 2.7.5
Perl 5.16.2
On 2/12/14, 10:30 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and I
> wouldn't be surpri
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and
> I
> wou
The 1.9.0-alpha1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this and I
wouldn't be surprised if we don't find some sort of problems in tes
21 matches
Mail list logo
