Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/stable)
Tested:
tarball + local dependencies
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v2) x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
2 tests FAIL (issue 3904, ser
Paul Burba writes:
>> Scratch that, the op-depth, pristine-store, and tree-conflict-data all
>> fail individually too. I hadn't realized that this:
>>
>> op-depth-test.exe 1 --fs-type bdb
>>
>> is not equivalent to this:
>>
>> op-depth-test.exe --fs-type bdb 1
>>
>> Fixed that in r1132796
>>
>
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
>>> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These we
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
>> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
>> the magic rev is r1130808. The
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
>> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
>> the magic rev is r1130808. The
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> All,
>
> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
> the magic rev is r1130808. The buildbots were green at that rev, and
> all tests pass for
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I have:
> * Debian stable
> * libc6-dev 2.11.2-10
> * /usr/lib/crti.o is reported (dpkg -S) to be owned by libc6-dev
I could see the above file,
$ ls /usr/lib/crti.o -alh
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1012 Jan 24 05:40 /usr/lib/crti.o
But for so
Senthil Kumaran S wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 21:23:34 +0530:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> >> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
> >
> > Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
>> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
>
> Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find some files it wants
> such as /usr/lib/crti.o. Maybe you are m
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:18:49AM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> javahl Unable to compile. See [1] below.
Hmmm... this fails because g++ cannot find some files it wants
such as /usr/lib/crti.o. Maybe you are missing a package?
On Debian this file seems to be in the libc6-dev package.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Oops, I am sorry for the spam! My email client screwed it up for every
> draft save :( The following is the correct email I intended to send.
Ignore the above, since my email client did not do anything wrong. It
was a false alarm!
Thank
Oops, I am sorry for the spam! My email client screwed it up for every
draft save :( The following is the correct email I intended to send.
Thank You.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> At long r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
> the magic rev is r1130808. The buildbots were green at that rev, and
> all tests pas
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> Sent: vrijdag 3 juni 2011 21:12
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: 1.7.0-alpha1 tarballs up for testing/signing
>
> All,
>
> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:12:07PM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> All,
>
> At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
> 1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
> the magic rev is r1130808. The buildbots were green at that rev, and
> all test
All,
At long request, we now have tarballs for the first 1.7.0 pre-release:
1.7.0-alpha1 ("phoenix-hatchling"). These were cut from trunk, and
the magic rev is r1130808. The buildbots were green at that rev, and
all tests pass for me locally. You can find them here:
http://people.apache.org/~hw
16 matches
Mail list logo
