Re: 1.7 and obliterate

2010-08-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[C. Michael Pilato] > But, as you said, it's version control -- nothing is ever really lost! A funny thing to say in a conversation about the obliterate feature. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/

Re: 1.7 and obliterate

2010-08-18 Thread i . grok
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:17:58PM -0700, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Thanks for the update, Julian. Great that you were able to make progress at > all on such a difficult problem; bummer that Reality showed her dark side. > But, as you said, it's version control -- nothing is ever really lost! Unt

Re: 1.7 and obliterate

2010-08-18 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Thanks for the update, Julian. Great that you were able to make progress at all on such a difficult problem; bummer that Reality showed her dark side. But, as you said, it's version control -- nothing is ever really lost! On 08/18/2010 08:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18, C. Michae

Re: 1.7 and obliterate

2010-08-18 Thread Julian Foad
On Wed, 2010-08-18, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > What's the status of obliterate? Heh. I started down a path that looked promising initially but became ever more difficult. The parts that are checked in are the easy parts - hook script support and some ability to remove node-revs from the reposito

1.7 and obliterate

2010-08-18 Thread C. Michael Pilato
What's the status of obliterate? I get the sense that it exists in our codebase, for all practical purposes, in name only. If that's true, and if that's the state it's expected to be in when 1.7 ships, then I'd really, really like to just see the feature not ship at all. We don't have to can all