On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:20:16PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > The Subversion project has much closer ties to various Linux
> > distributions now than it had around the time of the 1.6 pre-release
> > phase. This is partly due to efforts by elego -- we actively help out
> > with the official
[Stefan Sperling]
> Because of the substantial changes done for 1.7, we will need
> pre-release testing more than ever. So doing source-only 1.7 preview
> releases would pose a major problem. We will have to actively push
> for pre-release testing by providing binaries.
I've always shied away fro
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:08 PM
> To: Hyrum K. Wright
> Cc: Talden; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.7 Release Plan
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:43, Hyrum K. Wright
> wro
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:13PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Talden wrote:
>> >> It looks like we might be fairly close to having on-disk formats
>> >> stabilized, and hence rolling alphas. Prerelea
On 29/07/10 10:59, Stefan Sperling wrote:
[snip]
> For the platforms mentioned above, I will try to push for 1.7 binaries
> during all phases of pre-release testing (alpha, beta, rc).
> To encourage wide testing, the plan is to make these available in
> conveniently installable form:
> - launchpa
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:43, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> The project doesn't typically provide binaries, partly because there
> are so many different combinations that it's hard to justify which
> ones to build and which not too.
>
> However, providing binaries of these releases may be really usefu
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:13PM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Talden wrote:
> >> It looks like we might be fairly close to having on-disk formats
> >> stabilized, and hence rolling alphas. Prereleases may be fairly
> >> prolific, since I want to work the bugs
Hi Hyrum, et al,
I am just shooting from the hip
But I seem to remember a previous discussion that went along the lines of
"pre-building" development environments.
I "thought" - the plan was to use the deps collection and supply a (insert
compiler brand / version here) configuration file.
A
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Talden wrote:
>> It looks like we might be fairly close to having on-disk formats
>> stabilized, and hence rolling alphas. Prereleases may be fairly
>> prolific, since I want to work the bugs out of the transition to ASF
>> distribution infrastructure, and get fix
> It looks like we might be fairly close to having on-disk formats
> stabilized, and hence rolling alphas. Prereleases may be fairly
> prolific, since I want to work the bugs out of the transition to ASF
> distribution infrastructure, and get fixes into the hands of users
> rapidly.
I'm very inte
This is a draft of the release plan for 1.7. I figure it's important
to document this somewhere other than my grey cells.
Release types
===
The following define the various types of releases reference
throughout this plan, in order of increasing stability. While there
is no requirement t
11 matches
Mail list logo
