Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:01 +, Julian Foad wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:43 +, Julian Foad wrote: > > > > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...] > > > > I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests > > ... working. > > I have not been able to run an

Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:43 +, Julian Foad wrote: > > > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...] > > I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests ... working. I have not been able to run any of the bindings tests. Details at or

Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

> > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...] I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests Summary: +1 to release (Unix). My two signatures were successfully collected by your script. Tested: [ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ] Env

Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:58:47PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:31:55PM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > We got two sigs for each of Windows and Unix for 1.5.9, but the > > signing process has stalled from there. I'd still like to release > > this, if possible, but w

RE: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of > Hyrum K. Wright > Sent: maandag 20 december 2010 19:32 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing) > > We

Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:31:55PM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > We got two sigs for each of Windows and Unix for 1.5.9, but the > signing process has stalled from there. I'd still like to release > this, if possible, but we should probably make a decision at some > point. I have run tests but

Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

We got two sigs for each of Windows and Unix for 1.5.9, but the signing process has stalled from there. I'd still like to release this, if possible, but we should probably make a decision at some point. -Hyrum On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for te

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

Quick reminder that we are still lacking one Unix sig and one Windows sig for this release. -Hyrum On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing.  The magic revision is > r1041577: > http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/ > > To sig

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On 12/03/2010 09:04 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not both. Did you do 2 builds to test this? I think you are confusing it with 1.4.x. We added support in 1.5.x for su

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran > wrote: >> Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not >> both. Did you do 2 builds to test this? > > I think you are confusing it with 1.4.x.  We added su

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote: > Forgive my ignorance Paul. IIUC in 1.5.x we can only have neon or serf not > both. Did you do 2 builds to test this? I think you are confusing it with 1.4.x. We added support in 1.5.x for supporting both: http://subversion.apache.org

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On 12/03/2010 08:14 PM, Paul Burba wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r1041577: http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/ To sign the release, please input your signatures using the script her

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

SUMMARY: +1 to release PLATFORM: Windows 7 VS 2008 SP1 Java 1.6 COMPONENTS: Apache2.2.15 APR 1.4.2 APR-UTIL1.3.9 OpenSSL 1.0.0a Neon0.29.5 ZLib (from deps) VERIFIED: md5 and sha1 sums gpg signature verified TESTED: JavaHL ra_loca

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing.  The magic revision is > r1041577: > http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/ > > To sign the release, please input your signatures using the script here: > http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

Summary: +1 to release. Platform: Linux (Debian/stable). Verified: signatures, MD5 checksums, SHA1 checksums only expected difference compared to tags/1.5.9 Tested: 1.5.9 tarball with local dependencies (not deps tarball) (local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon, javahl) x (fsfs, bdb)

Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing

On 12/02/2010 04:55 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is > r1041577: > http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/ Summary: +1 to release. Platform: Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) Linux. Tested: 1.5.9 tarball with local dependenci

1.5.9 up for testing/signing

1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r1041577: http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.5.9/ To sign the release, please input your signatures using the script here: http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py (The script worked pretty well for 1.6.15, but