Re: svn commit: r1683544 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c

2015-06-04 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 4 June 2015 at 16:34, Bert Huijben wrote: > I would say it is safer to cache SVN_INVALID_REVNUM (or another certainly > invalid revision number) than to set the potentially valid r0. > Hi Bert, Any repository has zero revision, so it's pretty safe to assume that repository youngest revision at

Re: svn commit: r1683544 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c

2015-06-04 Thread Bert Huijben
I would say it is safer to cache SVN_INVALID_REVNUM (or another certainly invalid revision number) than to set the potentially valid r0. Bert Sent from Surface From: Ivan Zhakov Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎June‎ ‎4‎, ‎2015 ‎3‎:‎25‎ ‎PM To: comm...@subversion.apache.org Author: ivan Date: