On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>> The easiest way is to use existing tests as a starting point.:
>> - Test test_serf_connection_request_create sends 2 requests and responses.
>> This tests sends two pipelined requests, but you can modifiy it t
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> The easiest way is to use existing tests as a starting point.:
> - Test test_serf_connection_request_create sends 2 requests and responses.
> This tests sends two pipelined requests, but you can modifiy it to
> send the 1st request, then run the serf loop, then send th
Philip Martin writes:
> $ valgrind -q test/test_all
> ==11901== Invalid read of size 8
> ==11901==at 0x403E7CF: serf_config_get_object (config_store.c:278)
> ==11901==by 0x403F88A: serf__log (logging.c:146)
> ==11901==by 0x4048E79: serf_log_wrapped_readline
> (log_wrapper_buckets.c:5
Philip Martin writes:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>> Is there a reason you specifically mention pipelined here? The first
>> response has been handled so it's just synchronous communication.
>
> The point is that the client reads data from the server before sending
> the second response. If the
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Philip Martin
>>
>> I'm not familiar with serf's testsuite. The scenario:
>>
>> - client sends first request
>> - server sends response
>> - server sends extra data, say '\n'
>> - client handles first request
>> - client creat
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>> You're trying to capture the situation where serf has:
>> - finished writing a request ( req_bkt == NULL && writing_started )
>> - has no more requests in the pending queue
>> - and receives actual bytes of data
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> You're trying to capture the situation where serf has:
> - finished writing a request ( req_bkt == NULL && writing_started )
> - has no more requests in the pending queue
> - and receives actual bytes of data.
> Right?
>
> Looks like your patch is a correct way to fix th
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> While debugging a problem reported on users I accidentally sent an extra
>>> byte to the client: I sent Content-Length of N and then sent N+1 bytes.
>>> The first N bytes made a
8 matches
Mail list logo
