> Sounds great.
>
> Should the Subversion project plan to write and publish advisories for
> these CVEs, or has the requester already done so?
I'm not affiliated with subversion so it's up to them (I assume they
won't since they didn't do so originally).
> -Hyrum
--
Kurt Seifried
k...@seifried.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Josh Bressers wrote:
>
> OK, let's split the CVE id then.
>
> So for
> A, "* prevent crash in mod_dav_svn when using SVNParentPath (r1033166)"
> Upstream changeset:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1033166
>
> Let's use CVE-2010-4539.
>
> For
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jan Lieskovsky
> wrote:
> > Hello Kurt, Josh, vendors,
> >
> > Josh Bressers wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>>
> >>> Unspecified vulnerability in the server component in Apache
> >>> Subversion
> >>> 1.6.x before 1.6
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> Hello Kurt, Josh, vendors,
>
> Josh Bressers wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>>
>>> Unspecified vulnerability in the server component in Apache Subversion
>>> 1.6.x before 1.6.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of
>>> se
4 matches
Mail list logo