Julian Foad wrote:
Minor aesthetic change, but one I do agree. One concern I also
had was "am I complicating matters more by introducing so many
different mtimes?"
I'm not 100% clear what those properties are for, but I'm pretty sure
you are complicating matters too much by suggesting them.
On Mon, 2010-01-04, Ed wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> Sorry for the long delay in response. Year end issues and
> problems prevented me from making a decent response to your
> post.
>
> Philip Martin wrote:
>
>
> > Edmund writes:
> >
> >> +* High-level semantics we are trying to achieve:
> >> +
> >
Philipp Marek wrote:
On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Branko Čibej wrote:
Edmund Wong wrote:
The patch is attached to this one. Thanks Phlip!
Apparently you're having trouble sending patches, because nothing came
through again. Do you have an outgoing mail filter, perhaps? I don't
believe Apache
Hi Philip,
Sorry for the long delay in response. Year end issues and
problems prevented me from making a decent response to your
post.
Philip Martin wrote:
Edmund writes:
+* High-level semantics we are trying to achieve:
+
+- Whenever Subversion puts or modifies a file (or directory)
Edmund writes:
> +* High-level semantics we are trying to achieve:
> +
> +- Whenever Subversion puts or modifies a file (or directory) in
> + the WC, it shall set the node's mtime in the WC to the mtime
> + recorded for that node as given by the server. It also saves
> + th
On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
> > The patch is attached to this one. Thanks Phlip!
>
> Apparently you're having trouble sending patches, because nothing came
> through again. Do you have an outgoing mail filter, perhaps? I don't
> believe Apache mail serve
Hi,
I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
to restart.
Seriously, here's my attempt at doing the MTime specification and
would like to apologize ahead of time if I were to have made
a mockery of the process and might have wasted people's time
reading it.
My major con
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:38:35 +0100, Branko [UTF-8?]Äibej wrote
> >
> > While it wasn't late at night, I'll blame it on being tired.
> > I *thought* I had included it.
> >
> > The patch is attached to this one. Thanks Phlip!
> >
>
> Apparently you're having trouble sending patches, because not
Edmund Wong wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:28:04 +0100, Philipp Marek wrote
>
>> Hello Edmund,
>>
>> On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Edmund Wong wrote:
>>
>>> I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
>>> to restart.
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>> PS: Due to my anxiet
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:28:04 +0100, Philipp Marek wrote
> Hello Edmund,
>
> On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Edmund Wong wrote:
> > I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
> > to restart.
> ...
> > PS: Due to my anxiety, I forgot to include the patch. Silly me.
> I think i
Hello Edmund,
On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Edmund Wong wrote:
> I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
> to restart.
...
> PS: Due to my anxiety, I forgot to include the patch. Silly me.
I think it was too late in the night - did you forget the patch a second time,
o
Hi,
I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
to restart.
Seriously, here's my attempt at doing the MTime specification and
would like to apologize ahead of time if I were to have made
a mockery of the process and might have wasted people's time
reading it.
My major
Hi,
I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
to restart.
Seriously, here's my attempt at doing the MTime specification and
would like to apologize ahead of time if I were to have made
a mockery of the process and might have wasted people's time
reading it.
My major
13 matches
Mail list logo
