Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2015-01-05 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.01.2015 23:04, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 02.01.2015 13:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > >> Now there are only two points left > >> > >> * Be explicit in our coding style guide about the mandatory > >> svn_ prefix in all non-static identif

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2015-01-04 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.01.2015 23:04, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.01.2015 13:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> Now there are only two points left >> >> * Be explicit in our coding style guide about the mandatory >> svn_ prefix in all non-static identifiers. > If this is not already stated explicitly in HACKING, it sh

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2015-01-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.01.2015 13:31, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Now there are only two points left > > * Be explicit in our coding style guide about the mandatory > svn_ prefix in all non-static identifiers. If this is not already stated explicitly in HACKING, it should be. You just volunteered to check and fix.

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2015-01-02 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.12.2014 13:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules, > > mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that > > complies to our rules but also refines them. > > > > I'd

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2014-12-30 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.12.2014 13:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules, > > mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that > > complies to our rules but also refines them. > > > > I'd

Re: [RFC] Refining our naming rules

2014-12-29 Thread Branko Čibej
On 29.12.2014 13:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Hi there, > > FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules, > mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that > complies to our rules but also refines them. > > I'd like to amend our coding guideline with the following > suggestions (n

[RFC] Refining our naming rules

2014-12-29 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Hi there, FSX code contains various violations to our naming rules, mostly taken over FSFS. I thought about a scheme that complies to our rules but also refines them. I'd like to amend our coding guideline with the following suggestions (not as a strict requirement). The first one is actually "ne