Also, note that all the '-r' / '-c' syntaxes are directly related to peg
revisions --- they are always interpreted relative to some peg revision
(which, in this case, is the implicit "BASE" peg provided by
svn_opt_push_implicit_dot_target())
Branko Čibej wrote on Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 19:34:06 +010
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 17:21:13 +:
> On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
> >added? That's less likely to get out of date.
> >
> >For example
> >
> >% svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD
> >subversion/t
On 24.02.2013 19:14, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 24/02/13 17:57, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
>
>> "svn diff" on which target? :)
>>
>
> Well, "svn diff -c 858288" works great, so I assumed that it's legit :>
>
> (now I have to wonder _why_ this works, heh)
>
>
On 24/02/13 17:57, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
"svn diff" on which target? :)
Well, "svn diff -c 858288" works great, so I assumed that it's legit :>
(now I have to wonder _why_ this works, heh)
If I run your command on the root of a trunk checkout, th
On 24.02.2013 18:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
> On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
>> added? That's less likely to get out of date.
>>
>> For example
>>
>> % svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD
>> subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-r
On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
How about just linking to a revnum wherein a standalone application was
added? That's less likely to get out of date.
For example
% svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 21:15:18 +:
> On 22/02/13 20:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 17:13:08 +:
> >>On 20/02/13 21:06, Ben Reser wrote:
> >>>You skipped the primary function of gen-make.py which is caused by
> >>>this call "ge
On 22/02/13 20:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 17:13:08 +:
On 20/02/13 21:06, Ben Reser wrote:
You skipped the primary function of gen-make.py which is caused by
this call "generator.write()".
There are two gen-make.py files -- I was describing /trun
danny.mckin...@sungard.com wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 20:12:42 +:
> Then we will need to purchase a certificate for that server unless
> Eric knows where we can get a domain named signed cert.
Wrong number?
+01 816 460 3226 . Mob +01 816 506 9639
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:04 PM
To: Gabriela Gibson
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: [RFC] Build System Documentation
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 14
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 17:13:08 +:
> On 20/02/13 21:06, Ben Reser wrote:
> > You can easily see the difference
>> by running `./autogen.sh` saving the build-outputs.mk and then running
>> `./autogen.sh -s` and comparing the results.
>
> Should there be a section on how an
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 14:42:15 +:
> On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> % svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD
>> subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
>>
>> r965054 | danielsh | 2010-07-
On 20/02/13 21:06, Ben Reser wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Gabriela Gibson
wrote:
Thank you for the corrections and ideas, they have been worked into the
document.
Also
typo of recognized/recognised (depending on preference US vs UK
spelling).
What is the preferred spelling for S
On 22/02/13 00:45, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
% svn log -qv -l1 -r 1:HEAD subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c
r965054 | danielsh | 2010-07-17 14:23:38 +0300 (Sat, 17 Jul 2010)
Changed paths:
M /subversion/branc
(sorry for the delay)
Gabriela Gibson wrote on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:10:50 +:
> 2. Example compile
> --
>
> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk
> cd trunk
> ./get-deps.sh
Note that the serf this downloads must be compiled/installed (and
potentially pass
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Gabriela Gibson
wrote:
> I've written up some documentation about the build system, could I
> please have some feedback as to usefulness, style, shape etc?
Seems plenty useful for someone that isn't familiar with our build
system. The major comment I have is you'
I've written up some documentation about the build system, could I
please have some feedback as to usefulness, style, shape etc?
thanks,
Gabriela
---
The Subversion Build System, an overview
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
