Greg Stein writes:
> Heh. Call it "done" and changes come out of the woodwork. (gee, where
> have we seen that before?) ... there has been a good dozen changes
> today for minor cleanups, packaging, compiler fixes, etc. Nothing
> functional, thankfully (for a couple/three weeks, actually).
This
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:50, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:32, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>...
>> What to do about Serf? I'd like to think that Greg could wrap up his work
>> on the single remaining blocking issue in the next week or so. I've already
>> heard (via Hyrum) that h
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
>
> > Because I'm a nice guy (and to allow people time to comment),
> I'll
> > wait until tomorrow morning to create the branch, but plan on it
> then.
>
> +1
Is that a +1 that Hyrum is a nice guy, or that he will wait, or that he shou
On 07/12/2011 02:46 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
>> One question that I have is regarding housekeeping. Do we have any
>> actions which should be done on trunk (file renames, whitespace
>> cleaning, mergeinfo pruning, etc), which will improve ou
On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> One question that I have is regarding housekeeping. Do we have any
> actions which should be done on trunk (file renames, whitespace
> cleaning, mergeinfo pruning, etc), which will improve our experience
> when merging to the branch?
I took m
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>> The issue tracker currently has *no* non-Serf-related blocker issues open.
>>> Per prior agreement, this effective
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:32, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>...
> realize that we'd like to see the tracker sit quiet (blocker-wise) for a
> week or so before saying "ship the RC", but I think we need to face some
> realities:
>
> - blocker-class bugs can -- and will -- crop up after we branch.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Because I'm a nice guy (and to allow people time to comment), I'll
> wait until tomorrow morning to create the branch, but plan on it then.
+1
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> The issue tracker currently has *no* non-Serf-related blocker issues open.
>> Per prior agreement, this effectively means that there are no known
>> blockers, as we have a cont
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> The issue tracker currently has *no* non-Serf-related blocker issues open.
> Per prior agreement, this effectively means that there are no known
> blockers, as we have a contingency plan for Serf already (un-default it). I
> realize that
The issue tracker currently has *no* non-Serf-related blocker issues open.
Per prior agreement, this effectively means that there are no known
blockers, as we have a contingency plan for Serf already (un-default it). I
realize that we'd like to see the tracker sit quiet (blocker-wise) for a
week o
11 matches
Mail list logo
