Hi,
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Andreas Stieger wrote on Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:05 +0200:
> > On 06/28/2017 07:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Andreas Stieger wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:24 +0200:
> > >> Found this laying around... maybe someone who previously made
> > >
Andreas Stieger wrote on Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:05 +0200:
> On 06/28/2017 07:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Andreas Stieger wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:24 +0200:
> >> Found this laying around... maybe someone who previously made releases
> >> could check it out.
> >
> > Any news about this patch?
Hello,
On 06/28/2017 07:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Andreas Stieger wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:24 +0200:
>> Found this laying around... maybe someone who previously made releases
>> could check it out.
>
> Any news about this patch? I have some pending tweaks to release.py and
> don't want t
Good morning Andreas,
Andreas Stieger wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2017 12:24 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> Found this laying around... maybe someone who previously made releases
> could check it out.
>
Any news about this patch? I have some pending tweaks to release.py and
don't want to conflict.
> Obviously
Hello,
Found this laying around... maybe someone who previously made releases
could check it out.
Obviously we could just as well use SHA-256. What do you think?
[[[
Use SHA-2 hashes for releases
* tools/dist/checksums.py: also check SHA-512 digest
* tools/dist/dist.sh: also generate SHA-512 d
5 matches
Mail list logo