On Sat, 2010-12-25, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-12-24, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/23/2010 07:27 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> >> >>From IRC:
> >> >
> >> > julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
> >> > I don't think we see st
Julian Foad writes:
> On Fri, 2010-12-24, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> On 12/23/2010 07:27 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> >>From IRC:
>> >
>> > julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
>> > I don't think we see strict error codes as part of the documented
>> > behavior, unle
On Fri, 2010-12-24, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 12/23/2010 07:27 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> >>From IRC:
> >
> > julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
> > I don't think we see strict error codes as part of the documented
> > behavior, unless it is in the function documen
On 12/23/2010 07:27 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>From IRC:
>
> julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
> I don't think we see strict error codes as part of the documented
> behavior, unless it is in the function documentation
I agree with this. Any time a specific error cod
>From IRC:
julianf: We changed error codes in libsvn_wc all over the place.
I don't think we see strict error codes as part of the documented
behavior, unless it is in the function documentation
Bert: OK, but I wonder if we really should accept changes to a
libsvn_client response (which this is
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 15:53:58 +0530:
>
>>
>> Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
>> attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
>>
>> noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the
>> erro
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 15:53:58 +0530:
>
> Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
> attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
>
> noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the error
> code returned from libsvn
Forwarding one of the threads to dev@ with [PATCH] tag so that this gets
attention of more people. Julian said on IRC,
noorul: Now we're into the realm of changing behaviour. If the error
code returned from libsvn_client is different in 1.7 from what it
was in 1.6, maybe that
8 matches
Mail list logo