vijay writes:
> I have attached a patch which tests whether the error message contains
> "500 Internal Server Error"(In case of ra_serf/ra_neon) or the "error
> text"(in case of ra_local).
Committed in r1135651. Thanks!
--
Philip
On Thursday 02 June 2011 08:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+#--
+def block_unlock_if_pre_unlock_hook_fails(sbox):
+ "block unlock operation if pre-unlock hook fails"
+
+ sbox.build()
+ wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir
+ repo_dir = sbox.rep
vijay wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 20:18:22 +0530:
> On Thursday 02 June 2011 05:05 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> >vijay writes:
> >
> >>At the end of the testcase, I thought of checking the status of the
> >>working copy with expected status as "writelocked=K". But I couldn't
> >>do it as the test
On Thursday 02 June 2011 05:05 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
vijay writes:
At the end of the testcase, I thought of checking the status of the
working copy with expected status as "writelocked=K". But I couldn't
do it as the test raises exception in between, i.e., during unlock
operation itself.
I
vijay writes:
> At the end of the testcase, I thought of checking the status of the
> working copy with expected status as "writelocked=K". But I couldn't
> do it as the test raises exception in between, i.e., during unlock
> operation itself.
I don't understand this. With your patch the test i
Hi,
Last week, I was working on this issue: "Whenever the pre-unlock hook
fails, Subversion server sends the error message "Unlock blocked by
pre-unlock hook (exit code 1)" to Apache. But Apache's mod_dav is
not handling the error and it is not sending any error messages to
client side, i
6 matches
Mail list logo
