Re: [PATCH] RFC on providing a more meaningful error message for swig-py

2019-01-04 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, 04 Jan 2019 08:11 +0100: > On 04.01.2019 04:33, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > > $ make swig-py ⋮ > > swig error : Unrecognized option none ⋮ > > So instead with the attached patch you get something like: > > > > $ make swig-py > > SWIG Python bindings not configured, py3c libra

Re: [PATCH] RFC on providing a more meaningful error message for swig-py

2019-01-03 Thread Branko Čibej
On 04.01.2019 04:33, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > Howdy guys, > > One of the TODO items I put in the swig-py3 branch README is to provide a > more useful error message if the user tries to build the swig-py bindings, > but they are disabled/failed to configure. There are several failure modes > that wou

[PATCH] RFC on providing a more meaningful error message for swig-py

2019-01-03 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
Howdy guys, One of the TODO items I put in the swig-py3 branch README is to provide a more useful error message if the user tries to build the swig-py bindings, but they are disabled/failed to configure. There are several failure modes that would prevent the Python binding from building, however c