Thanks Prabhu committed your patch in r1068802.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
-Original Message-
From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar Ponnarasu
Sent: Wed 2/9/2011 2:30 PM
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: Kamesh Jayachandran; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New XFail test for issue 3781
Hi
Hi Bert,
The problem was that my patch handled the expected error more
specifically and also failed to handle the svnserve case. That was wrong
on my part. I have tweaked the test case and attached a patch and log
message with this mail.
Please share your views on the same.
On Tuesday 08 Fe
> -Original Message-
> From: Kamesh Jayachandran [mailto:kam...@collab.net]
> Sent: dinsdag 8 februari 2011 15:30
> To: Prabhu Gnana Sundar Ponnarasu
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] New XFail test for issue 3781
>
>
> Thanks Prabhu
one 'for' loop
which iterates over [(rule1, section1), (rule2, section2)...]
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
-Original Message-
From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar Ponnarasu
Sent: Tue 2/8/2011 6:23 PM
To: Kamesh Jayachandran
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New XFail te
Hi,
Sorry for posting an older patch. Now attached the correct patch.
Please share your views.
Thanks and regards
Prabhu
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 04:41 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
Prabhu,
Please send the patch against the current HEAD.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
Index: sub
Prabhu,
Please send the patch against the current HEAD.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
-Original Message-
From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar Ponnarasu
Sent: Tue 2/8/2011 1:11 PM
To: Kamesh Jayachandran
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH] New XFail test for issue 3781
Hi Kamesh
Hi Kamesh,
I have created a new thread in order to prevent the confusion about the
test case. I have tweaked the test case as you mentioned in the previous
thread.
Here is the link for the same...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201102.mbox/%3c0213965108dead48960ce8345
7 matches
Mail list logo