Julian Foad writes:
> I haven't looked further into this, but what I think is the core of
> the problem is there's no way to generate a WC directory with its
> depth set to 'infinity' but sparse inside, without checking out the
> whole tree.
It might be difficult to do automatically, but there i
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 18.03.2018 13:43, Julian Foad wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 16.03.2018 18:33, Julian Foad wrote:
Suggested exercises for the reader (you, plural):
* implement a UI to choose the output format (currently 'svn info
--viewspec' is hard-coded to produce that 'format 2')
On 18.03.2018 13:43, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 16.03.2018 18:33, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> I implemented an output format compatible with 'svn-viewspec.py' in
>>> r1826990. Then I updated that output format to also support 'switched'
>>> and revisions, in r1826993. This version ou
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 16.03.2018 18:33, Julian Foad wrote:
I implemented an output format compatible with 'svn-viewspec.py' in
r1826990. Then I updated that output format to also support 'switched'
and revisions, in r1826993. This version outputs a header declaring
'Format: 2', and svn-viewspec
On 16.03.2018 18:33, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> We need to look at using the viewspec as input next. Semantically
>>> speaking,
>>> these sorts of things:
>>>
>>> * a way to check out a new WC to match the spec;
>>> * a way to modify an existing WC to matc
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Julian Foad wrote:
We need to look at using the viewspec as input next. Semantically speaking,
these sorts of things:
* a way to check out a new WC to match the spec;
* a way to modify an existing WC to match the spec;
* a way to modify/checkout a WC of a *different* bran
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017, Stefan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25/11/2017, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out t
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017, Stefan wrote:
On 25/11/2017, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017, Bert Huijben wrote:
At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
ou
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Stefan wrote:
> On 25/11/2017 16:12, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
>>> definition of a working copy, or in o
On 25/11/2017 16:12, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
>> definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
>> output.
>>
>> T
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
> definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
> output.
>
> Testing this on a test working copy with
> [[
> $ s
Very nice, well done, sir!
-- Stefan^2.
On 24.11.2017 14:42, Bert Huijben wrote:
Hi,
At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
output.
Testing this on a test working copy with
Hi,
At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
definition of a working copy, or in other words some initial dumb viewspec
output.
Testing this on a test working copy with
[[
$ svn switch --list \SharpSvn\trunk
]]
I can now see output like
[[
svn checkout
13 matches
Mail list logo
