Re: [PATCH] Fix svnversion message as follow-up to r922176

2010-03-30 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14:42PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote: > Ping! This patch has not been reviewed! > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote: > > Hi! > > > > The 1.6 svnversion message was "'path' not versioned, and not exported". > > But on trunk more than one mes

Re: [PATCH] Fix svnversion message as follow-up to r922176

2010-03-30 Thread Daniel Näslund
Ping! This patch has not been reviewed! On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote: > Hi! > > The 1.6 svnversion message was "'path' not versioned, and not exported". > But on trunk more than one message has been changed. My first thought > was that we should be backward compa

[PATCH] Fix svnversion message as follow-up to r922176

2010-03-14 Thread Daniel Näslund
Hi! The 1.6 svnversion message was "'path' not versioned, and not exported". But on trunk more than one message has been changed. My first thought was that we should be backward compat in our output but if changes of those messages are ok I'm supplying one. In case we will use new messages, the h