Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:05:43 -0700: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it > > was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db. > > I'm less confident that this is a good

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it > was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db. I'm less confident that this is a good solution for configure because certain platforms peculiarities hav

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:28:56 -0700: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700: > >> Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just > >> add "60" if we test with it because we have no

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700: >> Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just >> add "60" if we test with it because we have no auto-detection, so >> you're making a deliberate choice to selec

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially > > blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that > > blacklists it. (We can convert it t

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially > blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that > blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or > if someone asks, etc.) > >

Re: [PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Branko Čibej
On 03.07.2013 14:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially > blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that > blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or > if someone asks, etc.) > > Thoughts? L

[PATCH] Block BDB 6

2013-07-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or if someone asks, etc.) Thoughts? [[[ * build/ac-macros/berkeley-db.m4 (SVN_LIB_BERKE