On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 8/15/13 4:48 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> It'd be nice if this was printed under the linked dependencies section
> of `svn --version --verbose`, but I don't see a good way of adding that
> since serf is required by the dynamically l
On 8/15/13 4:48 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Thoughts?
It'd be nice if this was printed under the linked dependencies section
of `svn --version --verbose`, but I don't see a good way of adding that
since serf is required by the dynamically loadable ra layer and isn't a
core dependency.
Maybe we shoul
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Philip Martin writes:
>>>
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> Good point. I'll fix it in separate commit. What do you think about
> patch itself?
>
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>>>
Good point. I'll fix it in separate commit. What do you think about
patch itself?
>>>
>>> Is there any reason for the static optimisation? Does perf
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>>
>>> Good point. I'll fix it in separate commit. What do you think about
>>> patch itself?
>>
>> Is there any reason for the static optimisation? Does performance
>> matter? Why not simply
Philip Martin writes:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> Good point. I'll fix it in separate commit. What do you think about
>> patch itself?
>
> Is there any reason for the static optimisation? Does performance
> matter? Why not simply format each time?
Ah! You don't have a pool.
--
Philip
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> Good point. I'll fix it in separate commit. What do you think about
> patch itself?
Is there any reason for the static optimisation? Does performance
matter? Why not simply format each time?
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> Log message:
>> [[[
>> Add serf library version to svn --version output.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
>> (RA_SERF_DESCRIPTION): Add version placeholders.
>> (ra_serf_get_description): Add serf library
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> Log message:
> [[[
> Add serf library version to svn --version output.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
> (RA_SERF_DESCRIPTION): Add version placeholders.
> (ra_serf_get_description): Add serf library version information to RA layer
>description.
> ]]]
>
> Thou
Hi,
I think it will be useful to have svn --version display serf library
version information. Attached patch makes output of svn --version like
this:
[[[
C:\Ivan\SVN\trunk\Debug\subversion\svn>svn.exe --version
svn, version 1.9.0-dev (under development)
compiled Aug 7 2013, 15:48:17 on x86/x86
10 matches
Mail list logo