On 06/29/2011 08:07 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> My question is about this case:
>
> $ svn copy SOURCE TARGET@HEAD
>
> This case falls under the last sentence of point (C) above. Issue #3651
> [3] claims that the 'HEAD' peg should be ignored in this case, and that
> claim is explicitly tested by c
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 13:07:01 +0100:
> My question is about this case:
>
> $ svn copy SOURCE TARGET@HEAD
>
> This case falls under the last sentence of point (C) above. Issue #3651
> [3] claims that the 'HEAD' peg should be ignored in this case, and that
> claim is explici
I believe we should make 'svn' reject any peg revision specifier on an
argument where it doesn't use one. This is a rather long email to
record some of the details behind my reasoning, and a question mainly
for Stefan Sperling about issue #3651 [3].
First some context.
$ svn cat ^/trunk/readme@1
3 matches
Mail list logo