On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:25:16AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>>
>>> > Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
>>> > does NOT h
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:25:16AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>
>> > Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
>> > does NOT have a section like this. It is just doing a straight up copy
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:25:16AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
> > Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
> > does NOT have a section like this. It is just doing a straight up copy
> > of apr.hw. I've downloaded a few different versions of ap
Joe Swatosh writes:
> Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
> does NOT have a section like this. It is just doing a straight up copy
> of apr.hw. I've downloaded a few different versions of apr and none of
> them have a block like that in apr.hw. Heading over to th
Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
does NOT have a section like this. It is just doing a straight up copy
of apr.hw. I've downloaded a few different versions of apr and none of
them have a block like that in apr.hw. Heading over to the apr list
now to ask for more
Joe Swatosh writes:
> Thanks Philip and Bert, perhaps this along with Philip's changes?
>
> [[[
> Index: subversion/include/svn_types.h
> ===
> --- subversion/include/svn_types.h (revision 1460925)
> +++ subversion/include/svn_t
> Bert Huijben writes:
>
>> Isn't there an apr variant of this macro we can/should use?
>>
>> Bert From: Joe Swatosh
>> Sent: 25-3-2013 01:01
>> To: SVN Dev
>> Subject: [PATCH] #include limts.h for ULONG_MAX
>> While I found this issue usi
In r1460628 I changed the code to use svn_cstring_strtoui64 and so avoid
ULONG_MAX.
Bert Huijben writes:
> Isn't there an apr variant of this macro we can/should use?
>
> Bert From: Joe Swatosh
> Sent: 25-3-2013 01:01
> To: SVN Dev
> Subject: [PATCH] #include limts.h
Isn't there an apr variant of this macro we can/should use?
Bert From: Joe Swatosh
Sent: 25-3-2013 01:01
To: SVN Dev
Subject: [PATCH] #include limts.h for ULONG_MAX
While I found this issue using my very old compiler, it seems reasonable since
that is where ULONG_MAX has been defined for a
While I found this issue using my very old compiler, it seems reasonable since
that is where ULONG_MAX has been defined for a long time. (Since clearly no one
else is running into this).
[[[
For those of us with somewhat deficient compilers that don't provide ULONG_MAX
unless is explicitly includ
10 matches
Mail list logo