Sergey Raevskiy writes:
> Yes, the behaviour is *not* exactly the same -- the index files is updated in
> different order. Furthermore, I've realized that current version of algorithm
> will set some locks even if update of some index files is failed.
I think that is OK. What matters is that t
>> Recently I've spent some time investigating how lock and unlock are
>> implemented in FSFS and can suggest the following simplification. I
>> attempted just to make this part clearer and a new code is intended to
>> behave exactly the same.
>
> It's not exactly the same, index files are written
Sergey Raevskiy writes:
> Recently I've spent some time investigating how lock and unlock are
> implemented in FSFS and can suggest the following simplification. I
> attempted just to make this part clearer and a new code is intended to
> behave exactly the same.
It's not exactly the same, inde
Hi!
Recently I've spent some time investigating how lock and unlock are implemented
in FSFS and can suggest the following simplification. I attempted just to make
this part clearer and a new code is intended to behave exactly the same.
The patch is attached.
Log message:
[[[
Simplify implementa
4 matches
Mail list logo
