On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:52:12 -0500
"C. Michael Pilato" wrote:
> Hrm. You know, the 'svnrdump dump' usage itself is just plain
> broken. It appears to mean "dump the history of URL, perhaps for
[...]
Thanks for clarifying a few things. I see you have it figured out, at
least better than I have.
On 01/12/2013 11:47 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 12:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 20:21:42 +0100:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:16:57 -0800 (PST)
>>> cmpil...@tigris.org wrote:
>>>
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=410
On 01/12/2013 12:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 20:21:42 +0100:
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:16:57 -0800 (PST)
>> cmpil...@tigris.org wrote:
>>
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4100
>>> What|Old value
Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 20:21:42 +0100:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:16:57 -0800 (PST)
> cmpil...@tigris.org wrote:
>
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4100
> > What|Old value |New value
> > =
On 01/11/2013 02:21 PM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> OTOH, the user already supplied two revisions (-rN:M). I guess your
> suggestion is more correct ... but to me peg vs. operational revs have
> always felt overly complicated and unintuitive. Can't it, like, imply a
> peg revision of N, instead of HEAD?
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:16:57 -0800 (PST)
cmpil...@tigris.org wrote:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4100
> What|Old value |New value
>
> Issue ty
6 matches
Mail list logo
